By COLlive reporter
In 2014 Congregation ARIEL in Baltimore, Maryland, a Chabad-Lubavitch Center serving Jews from Eastern Europe led by Rabbi Velvel Belinsky, submitted an application to Baltimore County for the construction of a synagogue on a 3-acre property.
In addition to the planned synagogue, the existing house on the parcel located at 8420, 8430, and 8432 Stevenson Rd, Pikesville, MD, was planned to be used for the rabbi’s residence.
The congregation reached out to the neighbors about their plans and agreed to accommodate their concerns (like lighting, and esthetics) and acquiesced to even more unusual requests, including putting a community organic garden on the property and building a playground for the neighborhood.
Yet, a number of activist neighbors began a targeted campaign against the synagogue and its community. This group of activists included politicians, high-powered attorneys and prominent political donors. They created lawn signs, went door-knocking through the neighborhood, created a website and even printed special t-shirts for their cause.
They arranged community meetings about the synagogue where the representatives of the synagogue were not allowed to be present and respond to any legitimate concerns. The neighborhood residents who supported the synagogue were kicked out of regularly scheduled homeowners’ meetings. They managed to drag the small congregation into, what the judge said, was the longest zoning hearing in the history of the county.
Their official claims pertained to noise and traffic but subpoenaed internal communications showed a completely different motivation. The activists began their opposition even before seeing the plans for the synagogue, and were alarmed that their lawyers saw “no angles for us to use to fight it” after seeing the synagogue plans.
“I am not personally anti-Lubavitch but the blatant disregard for community rules must stop,” wrote one protester on Facebook, referring to Chabad-Lubavitch opening synagogues in non-observant neighborhoods.
“While I love Judaism, I am not a particular fan of these people, having experienced their brand of Jewish racism within the diamond industry,” wrote another neighbor, (confusing Chabad-affiliated Jews with a different group known for a strong representation in that line of business and the subject of much anti-Jewish rhetoric).
Another opponent of the synagogue wrote: “The last thing our neighborhood needs is becoming Smith Avenue,” (a nearby area where Orthodox Jews have been moving to). On social media some went even further, writing “Why do we need another synagogue? There are too many already.” “One synagogue is too many. There should be none.” The anti-synagogue activists were circulating emails calling Chabad-Lubavitch a “cult” and Congregation ARIEL and its leader – “fanatics.”
The subpoenaed emails also showed that the activist neighbors were colluding with the Baltimore County officials (from the previous administration). At the deposition, a zoning official spoke about “these guys in black hats.”
The opponents of ARIEL reached out to people in other Baltimore neighborhoods where synagogues were being built and tried to rally them against their local synagogue.
But religious affiliation was not the only excuse for the neighbors’ bigotry. The fact that the synagogue is servicing primarily the families of immigrants from Eastern Europe also did not sit well with them. “Who are you to come to our neighborhood,” said one of the neighbors directly to the rabbi, himself an immigrant who fled Soviet oppression. “Why don’t you stay in Millbrook?” (an area where immigrants were housed upon arrival). The neighbors spoke about “trucks with vodka pulling up to the synagogue,” exploiting an old stereotype of Russians.
The Board of Appeals of Baltimore County denied the Chabad Center’s application and even prohibited the rabbi to live in the existing house. “I wouldn’t want to live across the street from a rabbi,” said a resident at the Board of Appeals hearings, who is a member of an influential family who are political donors.
Congregation ARIEL filed a federal lawsuit for religious discrimination on April 4, 2017, brought under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). ARIEL’s complaint alleged discrimination against the congregation on the basis of its religious denomination, and substantial burdens on ARIEL’s religious exercise.
The bigotry of the neighbors became so apparent that one Maryland politician completely dropped out of the anti-synagogue campaign, and another had to tone down his involvement. An immediate next-door neighbor also quickly sold his house at a significant financial loss and moved out of the neighborhood.
During that period Baltimore County had four other religious discrimination lawsuits pending against it, all stemming from prohibiting the building or expansion of houses of worship. It has been said that Baltimore County was the only jurisdiction in the entire country to have five religious discrimination lawsuits pending simultaneously. At this point, Baltimore County has either lost or settled all of those cases, but not before spending $2.5 million dollars.
In 2019, as the RLUIPA case dragged on in Federal Court, a new administration was elected to lead Baltimore County. It immediately began reassessing the county’s position on these cases and started moving to settling them. On June 14, 2022, Baltimore County settled the case with Congregation ARIEL and compensated it for the damages incurred.
“We are very thankful to the current administration for righting the wrongs of their predecessors,” Rabbi Velvel Belinsky, Director, Congregation ARIEL (Chabad) told COLlive.com.
“We are thankful to our attorneys and other professionals involved in the case. We are forever grateful to the Almighty for our wonderful community who stuck together through this most difficult time. The people of Baltimore County are good people, what was done to us does not represent the people of our neighborhood but a few misguided individuals. In fact, many neighbors reached out in support upon seeing what was being done to us,” Rabbi Belinsky said.
Blair Lazarus Storzer, attorney for the Chabad Center, said her clients are “grateful for this outcome, which will permit them to move forward and serve their community as they believe they should.”
“It is essential that Orthodox synagogues, and all religious organizations, are free to enjoy the ability to exercise their fundamental right to religious expression,” Lazarus Storzer said.
“I was always sure that at the end light will prevail over the darkness of bigotry! We can now move forward with the plans for a synagogue, a home for our community and a place that will be a beacon of light for all in the area!” Rabbi Belinsky concluded.
How much money was the settlement for?
Glad to hear! BH
Can they build?
Best of luck!
This happened on long Island in Hamptons also. B”H they won law suit.
שלום