By COLlive staff
The Pulitzer Prize Board announced on Monday the winners of its coveted annual awards – and did not include the deeply objectionable New York Times series on the Orthodox Jewish community and their yeshivas.
While there is no way of knowing with certainty why the much-ballyhooed series did not receive a Pulitzer Prize, the news that The Times was not awarded for its one-sided and erroneous portrayals of Orthodox and Hasidic Jews was greeted with much appreciation and relief in Orthodox Jewish circles.
As reported on COLlive.com, an expose revealed that Brian Rosenthal, the investigative reporter of the New York Times, behind the coverage, lied about numbers and his sources and hid conflicts of interest.
KnowUs, a project of Agudath Israel of America, had alerted the Pulitzer Prize Board – in the form of a 30-page open letter mailed to every Pulitzer Prize Board member – that The Times based its coverage upon demonstrably misleading data, buried sources, and numerous other violations of the Pulitzer’s own journalistic standards. Had the series been feted with the prestigious Pulitzer Prize, its deeply objectionable portrayal of the Orthodox and Hasidic communities would have only been exacerbated.
Beyond its likely role in preventing The Times series from receiving this coveted award, KnowUs has shown, throughout the past few months, that there are those who still value truth, diversity, and religious and parental rights.
Countless outlets have covered KnowUs’ work and pushed back against the jaundiced narrative foisted upon readers of The New York Times.
“Respected intellectuals, secular Jewish organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League, and numerous national and state elected officials deserve specific appreciation for going on record, standing up for the Orthodox Jewish community, and fending off hateful invectives artfully posing as ‘constructive’ criticism,” said Avrohom Weinstock, director of KnowUs. “Such actions, and such people, give KnowUs and the Orthodox Jewish community hope for a more transparent, tolerant, and respectful tomorrow.”
KnowUs said it will continue to inject these much-needed elements, along with as yet unreported data points and balance, as they relate to Orthodox Jews, into the public discourse.
The Pulitzer would’ve been the PERFECT prize for the NYT’s bogus story on yeshivas.
If the NYT received a Pulitzer for the Trump-Russia collusion LIE, it should absolutely receive the Pulitzer for its LIES about Yeshivas.
I guess the SHEKER of our Almah D’shikra is Kaful U’mechupal.
Moshiach Now.
Trump & Russia wasn’t lies….
While I agree with the sentiment, the bottom line is that there are naive people out there who continue to view articles that have received Pulitzers as having more weight. Even those people shouldn’t see their horrible reporting on Yeshivos as worthwhile
You hit the nail on the head with that comment.
Was that article supposed to win? I don’t get it. There are literally countless of articles they go through, before they select who wins. Is this supposed to mean that because Mr. Rosenthal didn’t win the Pulitzer that proves that his article was worthless?
What’s the story? That he didn’t win a Pulitzer for the article? They give out one prize a year for this category and he won a prize 3 years ago for reporting on a different topic.
Can we stop harping on the issue after the rest of the world moved on?
Just because he didn’t win. That ‘prize’ has awarded many monsters.