ב"ה
Tuesday, 15 Nisan, 5784
  |  April 23, 2024

Obama, Where Were You?

Op-Ed: "The West is at war with radical Islam, yet President Obama and Mayor DeBlasio live in an alternative universe than the rest of us," Ronn Torossian writes. Full Story

Winter Camp Wraps in Florida

Next Story »

Was Jewish School Terror Target

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
#17 to 19
January 13, 2015 10:15 pm

We agree on the main point that “someone in the highest echelons” should have been there. The fact that no one from “the highest echelons” went, indicates that the reason had nothing to do with the president’s security detail. There was a total disregard for the event. It also reaffirms the contention that the president lacks interest in all things terrorist related…

thanks but no thanx
January 13, 2015 9:27 pm

I’ll go fox and drudge for broader news.. keep col chabad/crown heights related news. these re-posts – especially when they are not relevant – cheapen your news service TY

PRESIDENT OBAMA SAYS .....
January 13, 2015 8:53 pm

JE SUIS A RIGHT CHARLIE

To #19
January 13, 2015 7:05 pm

Really, that’s half the problem: no other head of state or head of government – even ones who are pretty major targets (consider Netanyahu, for one) – has an entourage anywhere near the size of POTUS’s. Frankly, it’s more reminiscent of a third-world dictator who likes to show off his power and prestige.

Be that as it may, though, it probably is just as well that Obama didn’t go… he would have, as he’s so often done in the past, made the event all about himself.

Shimon Shak to #17
January 13, 2015 2:56 pm

Look up secret service security procedures and be the judge on whether it would’ve disturbed or not!! The American president is clearly a bigger target than any of the others you mentioned so there is a clear difference between them. I agree that someone in the highest echelons of the white house should have went…at the very least Holder who was there at the time. My main point was that it was not unreasonable and perhaps even justifiable for the president not to go.

To #4 and his acolytes
January 13, 2015 12:40 pm

See, here’s the thing. The “chaos in the Middle East” of which you speak – the “Arab Spring,” the rise of ISIS, etc. – happened beginning in 2011. Not in 2001. And the reason is due to the American occupation of Afghanistan and then Iraq – as Bush put it at the time, we’re fighting them there so that we don’t have to fight them here. Only when a certain succeeding president decided that “war is not the answer” and that the troops have to be drawn down and eventually withdrawn, did that expose the United States as a paper… Read more »

@ Shimon Shak
January 12, 2015 7:26 pm

That’s what this was about? The president’s security would have “disturbed the event”? It was secure enough for Merkel, Cameron, Hollande even Natanyahu. Why wouldn’t it be secure enough for Obama? Also notice that the blogger (as most everyone else) suggested that he should have at least sent Joe Biden. Certainly it was secure enough for him…

Finally, why would you think the president would be at risk? There really is no enemy anyway. Right? Who was he afraid of?

Truth is it was a miscalculation. The White House already admitted it and so should you.

Obama DID send a high ranking representative
January 12, 2015 7:13 pm

He sent Abbas to represent him

#4 huh?
January 12, 2015 7:09 pm

I read and re-read your post trying to find one thing that makes sense. Couldn’t find anything. September 11 did happen under Bush. Stuff happens! The question is how do you respond? Bush spent the next 7 1/2 years doing everything in his power to protect Americans and the free world at large. This clown is doing exactly the opposite. He won’t even recognize that we have an enemy. From Sep 12, 2001 until Bush left office, the world was a whole lot safer than it is now.

To be fair...
January 12, 2015 6:10 pm

The French wanted world LEADERS to attend…

waste of time
January 12, 2015 5:48 pm

This article is so trivial. What has journalism become?

Is this a surprise?
January 12, 2015 5:37 pm

Our President supports terrorism…

Shimon Shak
January 12, 2015 4:21 pm

Actually it was quite approptiate for him not to show up. As mentioned in the press an American president at the head of a million man march isn’t an easy situation to secure and he would’ve disturbed the event more than help it. The real question is why Eric Holder who was actually in France didn’t go!!!

American Jewish leaders
January 12, 2015 4:12 pm

Did any American Jewish leaders rise to the occasion to make a stand and take action?

No fan of Obama, but....
January 12, 2015 3:52 pm

Where were those security minded Republicans? Not a single candidate who is running for President ion 2016, not a single leader from the Congress, not a single leader from the Senate, aren’t the Republicans in charge now, don’t they need to show that they care about security so that we can trust them with the next election?

Of course, who cares about Jews, and who wants to aggravate the Muslim radicals?

Da– shame on all……

cma
January 12, 2015 3:16 pm

Not sure why you think true leadership is Obama showing up at rallies, or DeBlasio spending a night in a squad car. If I was a leader I wouldn’t do all that PC stuff.

partly right...
January 12, 2015 3:08 pm

The author is partly right, in that yes, Obama should have been there, yes, Obama refuses to admit that the terrorism is Islamist, yes, de Blasio has demoralized the NYPD and put NY at risk of degenerating back into the chaos that prevailed 30-40 years ago. BUT including the insulting language “beta male” is not going to get either of them to change their ways, if anything they are likely PROUD not to to be “alpha males”, that is too “last century” for them. Actually, I don’t think anything is going to get either of them to change their ways.… Read more »

notice the photo of the moment of silence
January 12, 2015 3:01 pm

In the photo of the moment of silence at the beginning of the march, the other leaders are standing respectfully with eyes lowered and hands at their sides (or in the case of Merkel in a prayerful position) — Abbas has his hands in his pockets and is just looking around.

YASHER KOACH COMMENT NUMBER 4
January 12, 2015 2:54 pm

Finally, a voice of reason in the collive comment section wilderness. Anyway, if Obama had marched the headline would have been OBAMA MARCHES NEXT TO ABBAS.

Not Buying It
January 12, 2015 2:35 pm

Yawn. Just what we need: Another phony “alpha” male running the country. Last I checked, September 11 happened under Alpha’s Cheney and Bush, as did the overreaction leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, creating chaos in the Middle East, and spawning ISIS. But never mind the facts. Always shoot first and aim second — its the American way. I guess now that faux Food Stamp Republicans have run out of things to blame Obama for, they’re down to the last page of their playbook: pretend to be the Great Protectors at war with something — anything… Read more »

Gd help us
January 12, 2015 2:06 pm

New president already

Palestinian pres Abbas in the demo against terrorism
January 12, 2015 1:54 pm

That gave me my laugh for the day.

WE KNOW WHOSE SIDE HE'S ON
January 12, 2015 1:49 pm

Not that it matters.

X