ב"ה
Tuesday, 16 Shevat, 5786
  |  February 3, 2026

New York Times Recommends Ohel

Often accused for biased reporting on Israel, the New York Times today had an unexpected recommendation: visiting the Rebbe's Ohel on a Sunday. Full Story

Urgent Tehillim for Young Mother

Next Story »

Picture of the Day

24 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moshiach now!!!!!!!!!
December 16, 2014 10:54 pm

Most defiantly not “final resting place” Chas vishalom!!!

morah
December 9, 2014 6:33 am

TheRebbe accepted everyone, on every level with a smile. If one person finds strength….it could be a miracle. Hope we all can share the Rebbes kindness.

If this silly piece of writing
December 9, 2014 4:48 am

will bring one Jew closer to Yiddishkeit and HKBH then its all worth it and would make the Rebbe happy.

To all the naysayers, bad publicity is better than none…

to # 1
December 8, 2014 6:12 pm

you wish

Pinchos
December 8, 2014 1:00 pm

another positive story about Chabad

to #16
December 8, 2014 10:48 am

From your comment it is obvious that you belong to the sect thats called “vanihiyeh b’eineinoo ka’chagovim”

Wake up. Lubavich is respected globaly…

To #13
December 8, 2014 10:16 am

כי ביתי בית תפילה יקרא לכל העמים…

What can you expect?
December 8, 2014 10:05 am

This lady is not a FRUM yid, she has no way of appreciating what a saintly place the Ohel is. Therefore, let her be, and thank Gd we have a better understanding of how to respect holyness. I hardly expect those teams to come to the Ohel and as she put it, toss the paper, so relax everyone.

Seriously?!?
December 8, 2014 9:38 am

What a bunch of kvetchers. Get over your farchnyokte attitude and be happy that someone gave your sect some publicity.

To those who think it's normal
December 8, 2014 12:48 am

Normal people don’t write or talk that way, about anyone. It was shameful and the fact that an editor oked it says more about the liberal NYTimes and attitudes than anything else. It’s not decent.

At #8
December 7, 2014 11:11 pm

its a standard way of writing an article to first put the entire name and title… and the afterwards just write a last name
I’m not saying it’s respectful especially in this case but from their point of view it’s all about having another well written article even if us lubavitchers are a bit upset.

"nondenominational"
December 7, 2014 11:09 pm

Really? That’s the kind of drive-by conjecture and careful carelessness that irritates, itches, than burns…
In other words, just typical New York Times.

Not that bad
December 7, 2014 10:24 pm

Rude how they referred to the Rebbe by his last name, #8, but other than that, fine.

prayer accepted
December 7, 2014 9:27 pm

giants crushed titans haynt inem zuntig klipeh

to all you nagative commentors
December 7, 2014 9:26 pm

dan likaf zechus

isn it beutifull they write nicley about the ohel

I think it is great...
December 7, 2014 9:01 pm

And not poorly written or degrading… It is not the words of a chosid, nor of a frummeh yid… But it is not disrespectful at all… (other than to the two lousy teams) For those who find it dsirespectful … please point out your problem with the article?

disrespectful wording
December 7, 2014 8:53 pm

[normal] people don’t even refer to their grandparents that way. Let alone a “righteous/rabbi etc” the Nosi of our generation.

Despicable Style
December 7, 2014 8:43 pm

The writer is rude and obnoxious but hopefully good will come of having the Ohel mentioned.

NY times
December 7, 2014 3:10 pm

We don’t need your Bracha or your klala

Aaron
December 7, 2014 2:59 pm

BS”D
#2 I resorted to a Mishabeach with no result

moshiach
December 7, 2014 2:44 pm

Is imminent!!!!!!

Oh Please!!!
December 7, 2014 1:56 pm

The type of wording could not be more degrading. But then again, what do you expect from the most anti-Semitic newspaper in America.

Oy!
December 7, 2014 1:26 pm

That’s just what the ohel needs, a bunch of depressed & outraged jets & giants fans tossing papers in… 😛

Go jets!!!
December 7, 2014 1:24 pm

Bring back tebow!

X