Create Account
ב"ה
Sunday, 13 Sivan, 5779
  |  June 16, 2019

    B’nei Brak: Shul Damaged

    Congregants of a Chabad shul in B'nei Brak were shocked to discover that a large sign outside the shul was vandalized last week. Full Story

    Island is Home to Sports Camp

    Next Story »

    A Communist is a Jew Too

    12
    Opinions and Comments

    To keep track of your comments, follow a conversation or flag a comment Login
    avatar
      Subscribe  
    newest oldest most voted
    Notify of
    nu nu
    Guest
    nu nu

    it seems like it was a mere correction not a vandalism

    to #1
    Guest
    to #1

    the rebbe himself on various occasions called the Frierdiker Rebbe ‘shlita’ after Yud Shvat. Go correct the Rebbes sichos kodesh as well for the same price.

    Chilled Torontonian
    Guest
    Chilled Torontonian

    I am not what is referred to as a meshichist and don’t like the idea of writing Shlita after the Rebbe’s name. However, it is much more distasteful to scribble something out on the sign of a Shul so that it matches one’s ideas and ideals.

    To an outsider to this very important debate, it looks ridiculous. Friends, in the end it is only a word. It really isn’t worth fighting over.

    to #2
    Guest
    to #2

    and how many times did the the rebbe right זצוקלל”ה נבג”ם זיע???????????????????????????????????????????

    An OLD sign!
    Guest
    An OLD sign!

    Pls read the article. This sign dates back far before Gimmel Tammuz and like most signs of its type was not changed.

    When was the sign placed?
    Guest
    When was the sign placed?

    Was the sign placed before gimmel tamumuz?

    READ!!!
    Guest
    READ!!!

    The sign has been there for DECADES!!! As with most other signs around the world, they were not changed post Nun Daled.

    To 6
    Guest
    To 6

    You write. Do you read?

    to 4
    Guest
    to 4

    so that means it should be changed?!

    if the rebbe wrote both then both are obviously true! however it makes sense! and therefor if it says one way why should it be changed who are you to say that the other way is more correct (just because your own sechel says that way) when the Rebbe clearly wrote both!

    (and in this there’s nothing really to discuss when the sign -as it says- was there for decades even before gimmul tamuz and just was never changed like many other ones like number 5 and 7 mentioned.

    learn the facts #4
    Guest
    learn the facts #4

    the rebbe never ever ever wrote about the frierdiker shlita,
    the rebbe said it a few times but that is a chasidishe hergesh and certainly not a horoah lerabim

    to #10
    Guest
    to #10

    the Rebbe highly praised a certain chossid who had the koach to say shlita after yud shvat and said it was a good thing. the Rebbe even cried and bemoaned the fact that people reffered to the Freidiker Rebbe as dead. And with all that He proceeed to write nevagam zeya. As long as the Rebbe doesn’t say otherwise, ELU V’ELU DIVREI ELOKIM CHAYIM!!!!!!! Even if the sign would have been put up after gimmel tamuz, who is more kanoee than our Rebbe regarding his Rebbe?! who has the right to decide that something is wrong after the Rebbe himself… Read more »

    Maybe this one done by Shach's boys?
    Guest
    Maybe this one done by Shach's boys?
    X